Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marcelina Podlinska vs Elizabeth Jurna Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Podlinska vs Jurna analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcelina Podlinska vs Elizabeth Jurna Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Podlinska 1 - 0 Jurna
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Podlinska has won 41.81% of points on their second serve, while Jurna has won 39.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Podlinska, in recent form, has won 57.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jurna has won 46.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.67% and 25.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Podlinska has saved 50.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jurna has saved 40% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Podlinska has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Jurna winning 37.04% (W/L 10/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Podlinska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 74/ 57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Jurna has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 18/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Podlinska has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 21/ 15), where as Jurna has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 31.82% of matches (W/L 7/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Podlinska winning 1 times and Jurna being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Podlinska winning 2 and Jurna winning 0. The last match between Podlinska and Jurna was at the W15 Alcala de Henares, 22-11-2023, First, Hard with Marcelina Podlinska getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Podlinska and Jurna have played a deciding set 0 times, with Podlinska winning 0 times and Jurna 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Podlinska winning 0, and Jurna 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Podlinska has played against opponents with an average rank of 149.23 while Jurna has played against players with an average rank of 56.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Podlinska has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jurna has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Podlinska has converted 51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jurna has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
834
Rank
746
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
53% (98-88)
Career Total W/L
36% (27-49)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marcelina Podlinska | Elizabeth Jurna |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (25/38) | 45% (23/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (19/25) | 52% (12/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (8/13) | 29% (8/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 61% (31/51) | 29% (11/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marcelina Podlinska | Elizabeth Jurna |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (36/29) | 27% (3/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (300/260) | 38% (35/57) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (17/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 134.66 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (1222/1631) | 58% (86/149) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (663/1222) | 57% (49/86) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (171/409) | 40% (25/63) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (128/251) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (815/1590) | 37% (54/147) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (15/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (4/0) |
Marcelina Podlinska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dora Miskovic
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Emma Slavikova
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anamaria Federica Oana
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Helena Buchwald
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
85%
(
61 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Ida Johansson
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Ella Haavisto
77%
(
79 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
51 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Alessandra Mazzola
85%
(
57 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loes Ebeling Koning
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Jurna Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Min Liu
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
38%
(
36 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
18
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
30 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Garkusha
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matilda Mutavdzic
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Podlinska Vs Jurna Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
